Civil Disobedience: Henry David Thoreau and Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr

â€Å"Disobedience to be considerate must be open and peaceful. † †Mahatma Gandhi Throughout history thinkers have assumed a key job in our general public. Both Henry David Thoreau and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered their own specific manners of common insubordination, in their conviction that it was basic to ignore uncalled for laws. Their contemplations showed from thoughts, to speculations, and in the long run lead to our general public today. Common insubordination in a practical manner is the demonstration of a peaceful development so as to authorize the difference in specific laws to guarantee fairness for all. Dr. Ruler clarified in his statement â€Å"One who violates a shameful law must do so transparently, affectionately, readily to acknowledge the punishment† (220). All things considered, on furthest edges of the range, Thoreau inferred a forceful position spurred by his very own despise for the legislature yet King utilized religion, upheld by his magnetic methods of being delicate and contrite. While King and Thoreau both trusted in the utilization of common insubordination to make change, they approached utilizing common defiance in amazingly extraordinary design. As expressed by Dr. Ruler in his letter from Birmingham Jail, â€Å"Injustice anyplace is a danger to equity everywhere† (214). As to issue, King accepted that every single American people group are associated and that treachery in one network will influence different networks. Maybe, one could consider foul play as an ailment, for example, malignancy that structures in a single zone at that point rapidly spr eading and in the long run jumbling the whole social foundation. Dr. Ruler reshaped America’s social issues through a peaceful methodology in differentiation to boycotting transports in Montgomery to walking through Selma, King reacted to out of line laws with common rebellion and direct activity. Dr. King’s position on bias laws originated from profound quality. Principally utilizing ethical quality as a spine in his contention, we would concur that it isn't right to cultivate laws that influence a specific race or gathering of individuals. In addition, our laws are an impression of our ethics and it presents what we know is correct and what we know isn't right. Early thinkers frequently battled and confronted resistance with either the legislature or social gatherings. Resistance confronted outcomes, for example, imprisonment, torment, or more awful, passing, though the possibility of ruthless discipline incurred dread on the following person. In his â€Å"Letter from Birmingham†, King contrasted his calling with Birmingham to the Apostle Paul in the Bible, â€Å"[and how he] conveyed the good news of the ruler to the furthest corners of the Greco-Roman world† (214). Ruler communicated a real worry over the uneasiness to overstep laws; expounding the way that there are two laws; just laws and shameful laws. Lord expressed, â€Å"In no sense do I advocate dodging or opposing the law† (220). Or maybe more, King concurred that just laws ought to be adhered to; anyway crooked laws are to be met with common defiance. What makes a law unjustifiable one may inquire? From the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, King clarified that â€Å"any law that corrupts human character is unjust†. (219) Segregation gives the segregator a misguided feeling of predominance and contorts the spirit and harms the character. Back in Dr. King’s time, a progression of laws were passed that were the ethos of â€Å"separate yet equal†. Ruler energized in resistance of these laws as still partiality and vile, in actuality these laws were against ethics. Under this principle, administrations, offices and open housing were permitted to be isolated by race, relying on the prerequisite that the nature of each gathering's open offices was to stay equivalent. Signage utilizing the expressions â€Å"No Negros allowed† and â€Å"whites only† twisted our perspectives on race relations. Be that as it may, King accepted this in certainty isn't balance and it is against our ethics. Because of Henry David Thoreau utilizing common defiance and direct activity, Dr. Ruler was roused by his strategies which lead to a progression of occasions that would prompt the Civil Rights Movement. â€Å"All men perceive the privilege of upheaval; that is, the option to deny devotion to, and to oppose the administration when its oppression or its wastefulness are incredible and unendurable† (180). As Thoreau clarified in his passage from â€Å"Civil Disobedience†, Thoreau utilized the insurgency of ’75 for instance of awful government. Thoreau clarified how the administration burdened certain outside items that were brought to its ports. He at that point started to associate terrible government to a machine and expressed how all machines have their grating, in any case, when erosion assumes control over a machine, â€Å"and mistreatment and burglary are sorted out, I state let us not have such a machine any longer† (180). Thoreau explained on this thought the legislature is a machine and when underhandedness assumes control over, let us no longer have such an administration. He accepted not that an administration should exist â€Å"but without a moment's delay a superior government† (178), Thoreau contended that force ought not be left to the greater part, yet the â€Å"conscience†, in reality he scrutinized the peruser logically approaching â€Å"Must the resident ever for a second, or at all degree, leave his soul to the lawmaker? †(178) Thoreau feels that the â€Å"conscience† assumes an individual job. Thoreau addresses majority rule government, and immediately he encourages us to address why we ought to cede to the administration on the off chance that we don't concur with a law? For what reason would we have minds and have a still, small voice of our own on the off chance that we are not permitted to have an independent perspective and do what we need? Thoreau feels we should be genuine for ourselves, not the administration. Moreover, he verbalized that would it be a good idea for us to give up our musings, or inner voice to the legislature, or would it be a good idea for us to seek after a reasonable clarification of the difficulties that encompass us? What is directly rather than what's up is the thing that prompts common insubordination. Thoreau accepted that paying duties to help the Mexican-American was an unjustifiable reason, though; King unequivocally couldn't help contradicting laws that were partiality. In Thoreau’s perusing from his article â€Å"Civil Disobedience†, he contends â€Å"that government is best which oversees not at all† (177), which at last leads the individuals to train themselves. On the opposite side King clarified how â€Å"nonviolent direct activity looks to make such an emergency and cultivate such a strain, that a [community that has can't, is forced] to go up against the issue† (216). By reason for King being after Thoreau’s period, King utilized Thoreau’s â€Å"Civil Disobedience† and direct activity to start an adjustment in the public arena. While both Thoreau and King contended in light of profound quality, the two of them accepted bad form exist. Thoreau considers shamefulness grinding or pressure that can wear the machine out. Lord accepts that foul play just exists and strain must be made with direct activity to haggle with the machine. I certify Dr. Lord in introducing the best contention because of the crowd he connected with which obviously was the masses and his thought processes that charmed his bold and benevolent acts. Besides, Dr. Lord was worried about shamefulness towards individuals dependent on their race, religion, or sex; though Thoreau was inspired by his own contempt for the administration. Despite how either King or Thoreau utilized common rebellion, their commitments prompted a reverence for their works and illuminated unfair laws.

Women In Medieval Europe

Ladies In Medieval Europe I picked the subject of Women in Medieval Europe to compose my exposition about. I will endeavor to give some fundamental information about how the lives of ladies were troublesome during this time. A few things that will be talked about are the entries ladies needed to provide for men. To begin this article I pose various inquiries, the first is as per the following: What sort of work did ladies do during this period? Ladies that were from neediness blasted homes would need to go out and work with their spouses to get more pay since his alone was insufficient to help their family unit because of ladies having different youngsters. Ladies would enable their spouses to pull feed or furrow fields. Poor ladies didn't have shoes to wear so they strolled around barefooted and throughout the winter they would not have any winter garments to keep them warm so they would enclose themselves by sheets to shield them from the virus. They additionally took their youngsters to work with them since they couldn't manage the cost of caretakers like the affluent class could. How was life distinctive for affluent ladies during this time? Similarly as with any culture having cash consistently gives you more favorable circumstances. Albeit affluent ladies needed to comply with very similar things, for example, not talking except if you were addressed or just in the event that it was endorsed by a man first and comply with the men. Ladies of higher classes had employments to do too some would need to help maintain their organizations and in the event that their numerous organizations or properties that the family claimed, at that point she would need to assist her with husbanding over observe them as well. Obviously they could stand to enlist laborers yet there were somethings that must be dealt with by them by and by. On the off chance that the womens spouse died, at that point everything was surrendered totally over to her to deal with. Rich ladies had more preferences in any event, when it came to thinking about their kids. They had the advantage of recruiting caretakers for this activity. The caretakers would even b osom feed their children for them. For what reason would ladies in this time become a Nun? Ladies became nuns in this time since this was a way they could get training and increase a few rights. This was particularly well known for the lower class ladies since this was their lone any desire for getting appropriate training. Turning into a religious recluse implied that she would need to be chaste and the possibility of having kids would be lost. By turning into a sister ladies developed their own yields and had their own home. With the training that was given, they were likewise ready to seek after vocations. A large number of the poor families that had various little girls would cause their little girl to turn into a religious woman since they couldn't stand to raise them and to guarantee that they would get instruction. The terrible side of this was once you turned into a religious recluse it was prohibited for you to leave or have kids. Back in this time it was said that a lady that couldn't or would not shoulder a keeps an eye on youngster was of no utilization by any stretch of the imagination. What befell unwed ladies during this time? Unmarried ladies that possessed land or different properties were considered to have indistinguishable rights from men. In any case, in the event that or potentially when she got hitched, at that point she had to give her better half every last bit of her properties and she surrendered her privileges. Ladies that were not hitched could wear their hair out however the ladies that were hitched needed to wear their hair in a cloth wimple to cover her hair up in light of the fact that this gave indication of unobtrusiveness. Ladies couldn't pick their spouses. Men had the option to pick their spouses now and again. Relationships were deliberately orchestrated by relatives. Relationships did not depend on affection or feelings. Families would attempt to organize relationships between their little girls and children dependent on monetary elements. These components would be on the off chance that they had their own property, on the off chance that they possessed their business or in the event that they originate from an affluent family. So by and by cash had a lot to do with impacts with others. It was actually a marriage of property and cash that the congregation brought together and the families would have an extremely enormous horde of notable individuals to observe this event. This was usually between the rich individuals however shouldn't something be said about relationships between the poor ladies? The neediness stricken ladies and men typically wedded who they satisfied in light of the fact that the y don't had anything to pick up or lose. The lawful age to get hitched in the medieval days was 12 for young ladies and 14 for young men. This was a typical age to be hitched in those days as a result of the normal life expectancy. Because of absence of clinical consideration and medication, individuals passed on at an a lot more youthful age than they do today. There were not many reasons that the couple could get separated. A portion of the reasons they could get separated were on the off chance that they were not Christians, they were not of lawful age, in the event that they had past vows to someone else or the lady couldn't perform sexual relations. Ladies needed to submit to their spouses at whatever point he wanted for her to. Were there any influential ladies during this time? One individual could summarize this inquiry and that is Joan of Arc. Joan of Arc was viewed as a brave figure in France. She masked herself as a kid to join the military and got one of the most well known pioneers. Ladies were not permitted to join the military and that is simply the explanation she masked as a kid. Joan had said that she had dreams from God and he was calling her to be a warrior. There were different acclaimed ladies, for example, Hildegard of Bingen who was viewed as a renowned essayist of consecrated music in the medieval times, Christine de Pizan was a well known author and women's activist one of her progressively mainstream books were The Book of the City of Ladies and to wrap things up there was Lady Godiva, she was the lady popular for riding naked on a pony through the town of Coventry. She needed to demonstrate that the towns individuals were respectable and would not see her being bare. There were various much regarded Queens during this time, just as vari ous princesses. Last inquiry that goes through my head is was it actually that terrible for ladies? My answer would be yes it was amazingly terrible for ladies. Ladies had definitely no rights by any stretch of the imagination. Any man in the family could advise her to accomplish something and she needed to do it. In the event that she didn't do what she was approached to do, at that point she was severely beaten. It was said that a lady that didn't obey was defying God. A lady needed to surrender her property and rights to the man she wedded. Likewise ladies were not permitted to pick the individual they were to wed. Suppose it was a similar way today! Such huge numbers of ladies are so frank and exceptionally autonomous that we couldnt even consider a man running our whole lives. Not having the option to talk or would what we like to do however to be gravely beaten in light of the fact that we decide not to. Ladies were likewise all the time blamed for doing horrendous things. A portion of the allegations were rehearsing witchery; ladies would be consume at the stake for this. End: The end for my paper is that with the entirety of the exploration that I have done to perceive what the lives resembled for ladies during the Medieval Period, I have discovered that their lives seemed amazingly hard and unreasonable. To legitimize why this may have been, many would state Christianity. Eve was seen as the difficulty creator and afterward there was the debasement that numerous men thought ladies had due to menstrual cycles. While Christianity may have assumed a job with regards to why men figured they could treat ladies along these lines, it gave security to ladies too. It didn't permit separate for some random explanation (as it is today). It additionally didn't permit the men to slaughter their spouses. Sure they had the option to thrash them almost to death however in any event they got to keep their life. There were a few lords that treated ladies decently and had a lot of regard for them however there were not a ton of them. However, this was well over a thousand years prior and a ton of things have changed since that time. I am by and by, extremely appreciative that they have changed!

Genre Kryptonite Books About Libraries

Genre Kryptonite Books About Libraries This is a guest post from Jonathan Streeter. Jonathan  is a husband, the father of three young children, and an English teacher and tennis coach at his local Tampa high school. He blames his premature grey hair on all of the above and enjoys skiing, comic books and coffee. He has a B.A. in English from the University of South Florida, is pursuing a master’s degree in English Education and his work, a contemporary look at the fairy tale rendered in Crayola, adorns the walls of his daughter’s room. He spends his spare time split between lamenting his lack of free time and reading under the guise of grading papers. A trait I share in common with many an amateur bibliophile, literature aficionado and yes, I’ll say it, nerds, is my appreciation of books about books. I guess that after coming to terms with the crushing fact that I’ll never get a chance to read everything, I’ve subconsciously settled for the next best thing, and instead of reading all of the classics, I’ve settled for reading about them. So, after happily devouring the usual culprits from Nicholas Basbanes, Harold Bloom, and Thomas C. Foster, I realized that even this Cliffs Notes-inspired attempt was doomed to fail. Each great novel seemed to beget a dozen books of analysis, commentary, and criticism. My shortcut through the library had become a meandering and often circuitous quest as I often found myself reading the original classics anyway. It was Anne Fadiman who provided the stimulus for my escape, and after reading her essay in Ex Libris on the heartbreak she experienced at having to combine her library with that of her equally literate husband, I stumbled upon an answer.  Why read about the classics individually when instead I can read about them collectively? Why read books about books when I could read books about entire libraries? To set the record straight and hopefully prevent indictment from librarians and scholars of library science, I wasn’t after historically accurate, non-fictional fare. Instead, I looked for books that embodied the emotional resonance of the library, work that conjured the same aesthetic of literary appreciation and devotional reverence to the classics that I had always hoped to garnish by reading about them in the first place. With this in mind here are some of the standouts: The Library at Night by Alberto Manguel   From Alexandria to the internet, Alberto Manguel discusses libraries throughout the ages in a quest to distill the essence of the word down to its truest form.   The depth of investigation presented by Manguel is unbelievable and often transcends the physical confines of the library to explore the lives of the people who created, tended and died for the cause, to contemplate imaginary libraries or to comment on oral libraries now lost forever. The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco and Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafon These two historical murder mysteries are similar in their use of hidden, labyrinthine libraries at the center of their equally intricate plotlines. Both describe books worth killing for in imagery-rich prose, and the former boasts a movie starring Sean Connery. Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson Although this feels like cheating, the virtual librarian that aids Hiro Protagonist in this science fiction epic deserves a nod on a list of this nature. Having millions of books in his “its” memory banks, he is more than capable of helping our hiro in his quest to understand and combat a “linguistic virus” that stems from the creation of civilazation and reaches forward all the way to a dystopian future that eerily resembles our own. Sign up to Unusual Suspects to receive news and recommendations for mystery/thriller readers. Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

The Methods Of The American Revolution - 3308 Words

The Methods Leading to the American Revolution The colonist’s rebellious reaction to the British King and Parliaments actions led to their American Revolution. Did the colonists rebel in a justice form or was Great Britain taking advantage of them? Did the methods they used like the Boston Tea Party and Boston Massacre proper? Was Great Britain right not to include colonists to represent in Parliament? Was it right for Great Britain to tax the colonists or were the colonists right to revolt? The leading events toward the American Revolution started when the colonist objected paying taxes to Great Britain. They felt it violated their rights as British people because the acts were passed in England without a colonial representative. Not only did the British taxation cause their revolution, but it was also a unifying force in the colonies. After gaining France’s North American territory in the Seven Years war, Britain faced huge debt and the responsibility of a massive l and. The purpose for this land was to gather the resources and make extra profit to benefit England. Before Great Britain started enforcing taxes and acts, the colonists lived a life of prosperity and governed themselves. Great Britain showed salutary neglect towards them, and due to this, the colonists were not willing to be â€Å"tied down† with their governing. They argued The French and Indian War wasn’t their responsibility and the British shouldn’t tax them without representation, while the BritishShow MoreRelatedThe Methods Of The American Revolution3308 Words   |  14 PagesThe Methods Leading to the American Revolution The colonist’s rebellious reaction to the British King and Parliaments actions led to their American Revolution. Did the colonists rebel in a justice form or was Great Britain taking advantage of them? Did the methods they used like the Boston Tea Party and Boston Massacre proper? Was Great Britain right not to include colonists to represent in Parliament? Was it right for Great Britain to tax the colonists or were the colonists right to revoltRead MoreA Brief Look at the Green Revolution740 Words   |  3 Pagesin agriculture. Fortunate enough, an American scientist named â€Å"Norman Borlaug† found a solution to the problem by developing a movement termed the â€Å"Green Revolution† (Briney, 2008). Starting in the 1960s, this movement encouraged nations around the world to use â€Å"high yielding seeds and chemical infused fertilizers† to increase their productivity on farms, thus leading to a more rewarding lifestyle (Curran, 2013). Together, th ese materials made up the American way of farming, and the results madeRead MoreAmerican Revolution Accelerated evolution vs Cataclysmic revolution1624 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿The American Revolution was an accelerated evolution rather than a cataclysmic revolution to a certain point. An accelerated evolution is a rapid process of growth and change, while a cataclysmic revolution is a sudden and violent event that brings great changes. The extent to which the American Revolution was an accelerated evolution was during events that completely disregarded the government. When considered politically, economically and socially the extent to which the American Revolution wasRead MoreThe Justification Of The Whiskey Rebellion1430 Words   |  6 Pagescontroversial of them all, because it targeted those who used whiskey as a method of trade. Unequally taxing the citizens, the Whiskey Tax sparked a rebellion led by the farmers of Western Pennsylvania. By stripping its citizens of their rights, the American republic modeled the very government that they had once rebelled against. The government’s response to the Whiskey Rebellion was a departure from the spirit of the American Revolution. Desperate to solidify the power of the majority, political leadersRead MoreWestern Civilization1000 Words   |  4 Pagesassemble, and these restrictions could not be upheld. Fear of a catholic monarchy led to the expulsion of James the 2nd and the glorious revolution. Constitutionalism was the way of the future and in my own personal opinion it was the best way to go. Shortly after absolutism and constituionalism the scientific revolution came into effect. The scientific revolution of the seventeenth century was the major cause of the change in world view and one of the key developments in the evolution of the westernRead MoreHow Did Labor Change After The American Revolution?1626 Words   |  7 Pageschange after the American Revolution? THINK ABOUT: How did technology impact the older, artisan labor system, slave labor and industrial labor to 1877? What ideologies were in conflict over â€Å"free labor†? How did gender and regionalism impact attitudes toward labor in American society? The American Revolution was not the only revolution to take place in America. The Industrial revolution was happening all across America in the times leading up to the Civil War. The Industrial Revolution, which came toRead MoreThe American And Chinese Communist Revolutions1363 Words   |  6 Pagesthe American and Chinese Communist revolutions, some being similar and some being different. One of the main causes of the revolutions was that they both were inspired by the Enlightenment. This factor made both wars and their outcomes more intellectually based rather than physically. Another main accelerator that forced the people to fight for a change in their government was due to an unpopular method of rule. In both China and America, the forms of government previous to their revolutions andRead More Western Civilization Essays991 Words   |  4 Pagesthese restrictions could not be upheld. Fear of a catholic monarchy led to the expulsion of James the 2nd and the glorious revolution . Constitutionalism was the way of the future and in my own personal opinion it was the best way to go. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Shortly after absolutism and constituionalism the scientific revolution came into effect. The scientfic revolution of the seventeenth century was the major cause of the change in world view and one of the key developments in the evolutionRead MoreThe American Revolution And American History Essay1376 Words   |  6 Pages The American Revolution was an important moment in American history. The revolution shed new light on how people could live and how a nation could be governed. Looking back, one might think that the British saw the American colonists as a group of people easy to conquer. In the time period of the American Revolution, women were seen more as property rather than active participants in war, but women played a large part in the war. In the end, the American Revolution transformed the United StatesRead MoreThe American Renissance1169 Words   |  5 Pageslifestyle. Revolution is a fundamental change in society brought by people getting togeth er for a common cause. Many revolutions had taken place in human history, led by different causes, situations and people. Some examples are like political revolution, socio-economic revolution industrial or commercial revolution, philosophical revolution, Cultural Revolution etc. Those revolutions vary in methods, motives, duration and its effects on society. Sometimes the intentions behind the revolution or movement

Machiavelli The Power of Fear Essay - 845 Words

Niccolo Machiavelli stressed that â€Å"one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved†¦for love is held by a chain of obligation which, men being selfish, is broken whenever it serves their purpose; but fear is maintained by a dread of punishment which never fails.† He felt that a true leader must be cunning and deceptive, winning the hearts of his people through power and influence. If he could not be liked, he could at least get by knowing he has intimidated these below him into submission. However rash or cruel this may seem, Machiavelli’s argument is not one to be countered easily. Historically, many dictators and democratic leaders have almost always†¦show more content†¦People are unlikely to overthrow a ruler that they fear, for they dread the punishments of failure. If the ruler is not feared by the people, he will eventually upset enough of them that they will rise up against him. They will overthrow him because of his perceived weakness, and his name and image will be shamed in the eyes of both his government and his people. Machiavelli believes that the state is completely separate from the ruler’s private life. No matter how immoral or heartless the ruler may be in private, only his public image is important. A ruler can be a terrible, sleazy person on their own time, and when not involved with matters of the state, but at any time when the leader is involved in politics and the state, you cannot afford to injure the image of the ruler or else anarchy will develop. With this kind of rebellion can come revolution, war, and many other tragedies that could be otherwise avoided. While being feared may not solve long-term problems or may lead to rebellion, a strong, intimidating ruler will bring the best results within a limited time frame. To be loved requires one to gain the trust of the people and to prove one is worthy of it; a task usually fulfilled over a long spam on time, years or maybe even decades. In the 1930 and 1940s, a certain government party in Germany came to rule through harsh persuasion and intimidation. They had the love and approval ofShow MoreRelatedMachiavelli s The Power Of Fear Essay2150 Words   |  9 PagesMachiavelli’s: The power of fear All animals experience fear - an overwhelmingly disturbing force of the mind that has the power to sway, distort and rupture the conventions of the psyche. Any animal incapable of fear would have been hard pressed to survive, regardless of its size, speed, or other attributes. Fear alerts us to dangers that threaten our well-being and sometimes our very lives. Sensing fear, we respond by running away, by hiding, or by preparing to ward off the danger. The concept of fear in politicalRead MoreThe Source of a Princes Happiness and Misery in Augustine’s City of God and Aquinas’s On Kingship and Machiavelis The Prince1459 Words   |  6 Pagesprince should rule contrast with Niccolo Machiavelli’s described The Prince. Augustine breaks down the true source of a prince’s happiness as revolving around God while Machiavelli focuses on the prince’s material lusts. In On Kingship, Aquinas describes the sources of a prince’s misery being suspicion, jea lousy and lust. Machiavelli disagrees, saying those emotions makes a prince happy. Augustine talks about a prince’s happiness in book 5 chapter 24 in the City of God. He states five goals that doRead MoreCruelty In Niccolo Machiavelli871 Words   |  4 PagesNiccolo Machiavelli was once a diplomat over Florence , Italy . Unfortunately, He soon lost his position of power after the Medici family overthrow the monarchy . Machiavelli having lost his title tied to gather a militia to take back to Florence from the Medici family , but his efforts were in vain. He was captured , tortured , and exiled by the Medici family. At this time Machiavelli may have agreed with Fedrick Nietzsche that â€Å"Humans are the cruelest animals† in his bitterness after losing everythingRead MoreKant And The Prince Niccolo Di Bernardo Dei Machiavelli978 Words   |  4 Pagesphilosophers Immanuel Kant and The Prince Niccolo di Bernardo dei Machiavelli (1469-1527?) Manifest their theories on the portrayal of society and how discipline and authority regulate us. Kant expresse s his theory in his â€Å"What is Enlightenment?† (1784) Essay where he describes the immaturity of men is what makes authority able to control us and in contrast, Machiavelli deliberately addresses how to be a leader with the power of fear and truth. Although both appear in completely different sentimentsRead MoreThomas Hobbes And Niccolo Machiavelli s The Prince And Hobbes Leviathan1447 Words   |  6 PagesThomas Hobbes and Niccolà ² Machiavelli are known to be philosophers whom have helped to develop the views of political power and human nature. Both men had very different views from one another, yet at the same time they did indeed have many similarities. From having opposite views on Political Power, to having alike views on Human Nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli are men whom have shaped political philosophy throughout our time. Through the works of Machiavelli’s, The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan theirRead MoreNiccolo Machiavelli s The Prince1719 Words à ‚  |  7 PagesMachiavelli’s, The Prince, a book written by Niccolà ² Machiavelli, is a read that most people wouldn’t prefer to read as a first option but in defense to Niccolo, it brings out many themes such as Goodwill and Hatred, Free will, and Human Nature. â€Å"It is known from his personal correspondence that The Prince was written during 1513, the year after the Medici took control of Florence, and a few months after Machiavelli s arrest, torture, and banishment by the Medici regime† (Bio.com). The novel wasRead MoreSocrates Vs Niccolo Machiavelli Essay1606 Words   |  7 PagesSocrates and Niccolo Machiavelli are revered as some of the most influential thinkers of their respective times. Both of these thinkers developed their thoughts while Athens and Florence, their respective cities, faced political unrest. By questioning the people of Athens through their period of turmoil following a shift in government, Socrates was able to formulate opinions re garding how a government should operate and how people should rule. Centuries later during the Renaissance era, Machiavelli’sRead MoreThe Prince1232 Words   |  5 Pageshis or her support your job is over before it even began. Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher and politician during the 15th century shared similar political views that exemplified what is known to be a strong leader in modern day politics. A potential candidate for secretary of state without a doubt but also had several political point of views on certain topics that many today may not agree with. Nonetheless, Machiavelli served for the government of Florence, one of the most famous citiesRead MorePunishment In The Grand Inquisitor And The Prince By Niccolà ² Machiavelli1550 Words   |  7 PagesPrince by Niccolà ² Machiavelli. Both texts discuss a government or an empire’s attempt to maintain power over the people and punishment plays a key role in maintaining this power. According to both The Grand Inquisitor and The Prince punishment can counter instability and provide the illusion of strength to a ruler while weakening the people by portraying their selfishness and incapability. It is therefore evident that the purpos e of punishment in government is to advance power. According to the princeRead MoreSimilarities Between Machiavelli And Socrates1544 Words   |  7 PagesMachiavelli and Socrates agree on very little. While an initial reading of the two may elicit some comparisons, the goals of their respective philosophies rely on different foundations, and would therefore culminate in very different political results for society. Socrates would likely see in the Prince a selfish ruler, while Machiavelli would see in Socrates a dangerous idealist whose ideas would lead to instability and the death of the state in which these ideas were implemented. Machiavelli’s

Sociology and Family Members Free Essays

Family SOC 101 Introduction to Sociology Instructor: Sheila Farr November, 12th 2012 The sociological institutions I have chosen for this paper is family. â€Å"The family is the first group of people with whom the child has contact, and they are the most important, especially in the early years. They provide food, shelter, care, education, and support. We will write a custom essay sample on Sociology and Family Members or any similar topic only for you Order Now They describe and define the world to the developing child. They teach values, morals, and beliefs. † (Vissing, 2011) A person is defined by the family and they are taught how to live a certain way, but as they grow up society start to influence their decisions. In this paper I will evaluate the impact Sociological theories: Functionalism, Conflict, and Interactionism, will have on a family. How does each theory apply to the selected sociological institution? â€Å"The family is regarded as the most basic institution for all individuals because it is directly responsible for the care and protection of its members. The family consists of people who are biologically related but may also contain people with whom we live and people with whom we have close emotional bonds. (Vissing, 2011) The way Functionalism applies to a family is functionalist sociologists developed an analysis which showed that the family had evolved into a superior form. Studies by Murdock, Goode, and others were able to show that the family, in changing its form, had been left free to concentrate on the most important functions. Parsons (1956) saw the two most important functions to be the socialization of the young and the stabilization of the adult personality. â€Å"Th e functionalist view of the family is the notion of ‘fit’. The isolated nuclear family was seen to be a good ‘fit’ for post-war American society. The family had been left free to make a good job of rearing the children, with more ‘professional’ parents working alongside teachers and childcare experts. The family was also able to concentrate on the demanding relationship between husband and wife. The family provided both the child and the adult with the physical and emotional support needed for their roles in society. It also provided the motivation to be successful in an industrial world which laid stress on achievement by individual effort. The functionalist account of the positive role of the family in society coincided with a period of strong public support for the American family. Berger and Berger (1983) argue that this was a period when the American family was seen as a success, particularly in the way it placed the needs of the individual at the heart of family life. † (Wilson, A, (1985) pg. 21) The way Conflict applies to a family is the conflict role can be intense and uncomfortable, as people feel forced to make choices between work and family. Relatives may be upset when major conflicts occurs such as â€Å"financial pressures and money management; trying to balance home, work, community, and personal responsibilities; infidelity; decision making and conflict resolution; dealing with health problems; addressing personal, educational, and occupational needs of family members; maintaining a home and household; dealing with substance abuse, crime, or domestic violence problems; co-parenting; divorce and stepfamilies; and dealing with aging parents. A family shoulders a tremendous responsibility and usually requires assistance from others as a result. For some people work may come first and may be seen as a violation of the role of being a dedicated family member. Individuals may feel a sense of being â€Å"damned if I do, damned if I don’t,† no matter what they end up doing. Often work comes first because responsible adults feel that they cannot care for their family if they lose their job. When people feel important at work and home, they have a greater sense of generatively; when they do not feel valued or do work that isn’t inherently meaningful, the feelings of stagnation and alienation occur. When people feel competent and happy, the systems perspective holds that they may transfer those feelings to other areas of life, whereas when people feel stagnant and hopeless, those feelings likewise impact other aspects of their personal world. The way Interactionism applies to a family, Symbolic interaction theory analyzes society by addressing the subjective meanings that people impose on behaviors. A close emotional bond exists with them, what they think of us really matters, especially in the early years when children are being socialized to understand both themselves and their place in the world. † (Vissing, 2011) What are the similarities? What are the differences? The similarities between the theories are how they affect a family as a whole. Functionalism impact the functionality of family when everyone doing their part and there are no problems and, Conflict affects the family relationship as a whole, and Interactionism affects how the family interact with one another and other people. The differences between the theories are, functionalism is about the morals and values that are taught to a family to help them thrive in society, Conflict is based on outside influence that impact the family, and interactionism focuses on the behaviors family members pick up from socializing with different groups of people. How does each theory affect the views of the individual who is part of a family? Functionalism affects the views of the as a whole family, each individual person plays a role in how the family functions in society. Conflict affects the views of the individual because that person will struggle for to be heard, they will disagree and their actions will cause stress in the family. Interactionism affects the views of individual because they are learning new things as they socialize with others. They may start to act and dress differently and do things they never done before. How does each theory affect the approach to social change within the selected institution? Functionalism, see social changes as undesirable because of the various parts of society will compensate naturally for any problems that may arise. The way they approach social change is by not taking an active role in changes in their social environment, if things are going good they like for it to stay that way. Even if the family can benefit from the changes, they don’t won’t to run the risk of causing problems for themselves or their family. The family prefers to let the changes happen naturally without interfering. Conflict, approach to social change is by putting the changes into perspective. The social conflict can have a positive impact, when properly understood, in promoting groups to find common ground, form alliances, define core values, and identify the differences. Interactionism, approach to social change in family is people can chose to embrace the morals and values they were taught or reject them. Every individual has their own set of beliefs in a family and these beliefs are exercised depending on the individual. Family unit does not operate as a collective, even though it is believed to do so. Each individual in the family has different values that are attributed to age, associations, values, etc. A child could have complete different view on a particular subject than their parents. Within the Sociological institution selected, how does each theory affect the views of society? Functionalism, view society as functioning best when there is agreement about the social values and norms. â€Å"Conflict can have a positive impact on society views, when properly understood, in promoting groups to find common ground, form alliances, define core values, and identify the differences. † (Harper, N) Interactionism, society imposes a different set of values that can influence family member to do things different from the norm. To conclude, each theory has a different impact on a family. They each give insight into how society impacts a family and individual members. As person venture in the world they start to see things in different way. Functionalism is believed to focus on the family being close and being in agreement on thing. They appear to have no problem cause of the agreement to not interact with any changes and just to let them happen and go with the flow. â€Å"From a functionalist point of view, the family may change form and be quite diverse in its composition, but families have always existed and will continue to exist because what they do is so important. Children are born to people who will love and care for them, and are socialized about how to care for themselves and be a productive member of society. Families are the link to most of the other institutions. † Conflict, causes a family to weight the pros and cons of different situations because the child is now older and they are influenced by what they see from other social institutions. â€Å"From a conflict approach, families may not receive the support or assistance they need to adequately do all the things that are required of them. Some families function well, many need help, and other families are fragile or dysfunctional. The ability of the family to function depends on how the rest of the institutions interface with them. Conflict theorists acknowledge that the family cannot adequately do its job without contributions from the other social institutions. † Interactionism, is about the habits family members pick up from socializing and being apart and around different groups of people. â€Å"Symbolic interactionists focus on the messages that family members receive and impart to each other. Since the family is in the position of having the most intense interactions when children’s identities and bodies are being formed, what they say and do will have a significant impact on them (Cherlin, 2009; Benokratis, 2010; Lamanna Riedmann, 2011). † (Vissing, 2011) Reference: Harper, N. Journeys into Justice Retrieved from: http://www. journeysintojustice. com/author. htm Vissing, Y. (2011) Introduction to Sociology. Salem State University. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Wilson, Adrian. Family. Routledge, 1985. p 21. Retrieved from: http://site. ebrary. com/lib/ashford/Doc? id=5003764ppg=31 How to cite Sociology and Family Members, Essay examples

Universal Exposition 1889 Essay Example

Universal Exposition 1889 Paper The Exposition Universelle of 1889 was a Worlds Fair held in Paris, France from 6 May to 31 October 1889. It was held during the year of the 100th anniversary of the storming of the Bastille, an event traditionally considered as the symbol for the beginning of the French Revolution. The fair included a reconstruction of the Bastille and its surrounding neighborhood, but with the interior courtyard covered with a blue ceiling decorated with fleur-de-lys and used as a ball room and gathering place. [1] The 1889 Exposition covered a total area of 0. 6 km? , including the Champ de Mars, the Trocadero, the quai dOrsay, a part of the Seine and the Invalides esplanade. Transport around the Exposition was partly provided by a 3 kilometre (1. 9 mi) 600 millimetre (2 ft 0 in) gauge railway by Decauville. It was claimed that the railway carried 6,342,446 visitors in just six months of operation. Some of the locomotives used on this line later saw service on the Chemins de Fer du Calvados. [2] C ontents [hide] †¢1 Structures †¢2 Attractions †¢3 Statistics †¢4 Gallery †¢5 See also †¢6 References 7 Resources †¢8 External links Structures[edit source | editbeta] The main symbol of the Fair was the Eiffel Tower, which was completed in 1889, and served as the entrance arch to the Fair. The tower was constructed of wrought iron and was designed by Gustave Eiffel. The 1889 fair was built on the Champ de Mars in Paris, which had been the site of the earlier Paris Universal Exhibition of 1867, and would be the site of the 1900 exposition as well. The fair marked the first time that visitors were allowed to go onto the yet unfinished Eiffel Tower.Though not yet completed, exhibition attendees were allowed to walk up to the second floor platform. [3] Workers had worked through the night the day before the exhibition opened to complete the necessary construction needed to safely allow patrons to set foot upon the structure. When speaking of the dedica ted workers, M. Salles, the son-in-law of Mr. Eiffel made the statement that no soldier on the battle field deserved better mention than these humble toilers, who, will never go down in history. No one other than construction personnel were allowed higher than the second floor platform. [3] An equally significant building constructed for the fair was theGalerie des machines, designed by architect Ferdinand Dutert and engineer Victor Contamin. It was reused at the exposition of 1900 and then destroyed in 1910. At 111 meters, the Galerie (or Machinery Hall) spanned the longest interior space in the world at the time, using a system of hinged arches (like a series of bridge spans placed not end-to-end but parallel) made of steel or iron.The choice of construction material is controversial; the building was designed to be built with steel but was actually constructed in iron. Aerial photo of the Exposition Universelle in 1889, central in the picture is the entrance arch known as the Eif fel Tower Volume 10 of Studies in the History of Civil Engineering: Structural Iron and Steel 1850-1900 (published by Ashgate Publishing Limited and edited by Robert Thorne in 2000), includes an article by John W. Stamper, The Galerie des Machines of the 1889 Paris world’s fair.In it, Stamper claims that The principal material of the building’s structure was to have been steel, but the decision was made at the last minute to use iron instead. There is considerable confusion about this on the part of architectural historians, most of whom assume it was built of steel since that is what is mentioned by contemporary journalists before the opening of the fair. William Watson, an American engineer who wrote a thorough report on the fair after it closed states that the idea of using steel was abandoned â€Å"on the two-fold ground of expense and the necessity of hastening the execution of work. The price of iron was about two-thirds that of steel in 1889†¦. There is an extensive and elaborate description of the Expositions two famous buildings in the British journal Engineering (3 May 1889 issue) with illustrations. A follow-up report appears in the 14 June issue of Engineering with this summation: the exhibition will be famous for four distinctive features. In the first place, for its buildings, especially the Eiffel tower and the Machinery Hall; in he second place, for its Colonial Exhibition, which for the first time brings vividly to the appreciation of the Frenchmen that they are masters of lands beyond the sea; thirdly, it will be remembered for its great collection of war material, the most absorbing subject now-a-days, unfortunately, to governments if not to individuals; and fourthly, it will be remembered, and with good cause by many, for the extraordinary manner in which South American countries are represented. (p. 677) The 28 June issue of Engineering also mentions a remarkable Great Model of the Earth created by Theodore Villard and Charles Cotard.There were unseasonal thunderstorms in Paris during that summer of 1889, causing some distress to the canopies and decoration of the exposition, as reported by the Engineering issues at that time. The Exhibition included a building by the Paris architect Pierre-Henri Picq. This was an elaborate iron and glass structure decorated with ceramic tiles in a Byzantine-Egyptian-Romanesque style. After the Exposition the building was shipped to Fort de France and reassembled there, the work being completed by 1893. Known as the Schoelcher Library, initially it contained the 10,000 books thatVictor Schoelcher had donated to the island.Today it houses over 250,000 books and an ethnographic museum, and stands as a tribute to the man it is named after who led the movement to abolish slavery in Martinique. Attractions[edit source | editbeta] Plan of the fair A Negro village (village negre) where 400 people were displayed constituted the major attraction. [4] Matching closely the opening day of the Exposition, the Opera Comique premiered on 14 May 1889 with a work specially composed for that event: Jules Massenets Esclarmonde (debuting American soprano Sybil Sanderson), attracting and entertaining crowds of visitors for the more than 50 evenings the Exposition lasted.At the Exposition, the French composer Claude Debussy first heard Javanese gamelan music, performed by an ensemble from Java. This influenced some of his later compositions. William Stroudley, locomotive superintendent of the London, Brighton and South Coast Railwaydied whilst at the exhibition, where he was exhibiting one of his locomotives. Heineken received the Grand Prix (English: Grand Prize) at the exposition. Buffalo Bill recruited American sharpshooter Annie Oakley to rejoin his Wild West Show which performed for packed audiences throughout the Exposition.Other prominent visitors included the Prince of Wales (the future King Edward VII) and his wife, Princess Alexandra; artistsJames McNe ill Whistler, Edvard Munch, Rosa Bonheur, Paul Gauguin and Vincent van Gogh; U. S. journalist and diplomat Whitelaw Reid; author Henry James; Filipino patriot Jose Rizal; and inventor Thomas Edison A central attraction in the French section was the Imperial Diamond, at the time the largest brilliant in the world. [5] Statistics[edit source | editbeta] †¢Expenses: 41,500,000 Francs †¢Receipts: 49,500,000 Francs †¢Visitors: 32,250,297 †¢Exhibitors: over 61,722, of which 55% were French Gallery